AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of PAMELA ROBINSON, Appellant, v. PAUL BENNETT, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual determination to be resolved by the Family Court ( see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d 842, 843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d 629). The Family Court's credibility determination is entitled to great weight on appeal ( see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629). The record supports the Family Court's determination that the petitioner failed to prove, by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, that the respondent committed an act constituting a family offense ( see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 842-843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBINSON v. BENNETT
(Mar 11, 2008)