Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. Pietro F. HICKEY, Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pietro Hickey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not err in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial based on the State's comments during closing argument. We also find that evidence was sufficient to support Hickey's convictions.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HICKEY
(Mar 18, 2008)