AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH ORTEGA, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's determination designating him a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore should not be disturbed ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Imperato, 45 AD3d 659; People v Bula, 41 AD3d 569).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ORTEGA
(Mar 18, 2008)