Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Petitioner v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2008, the petition for allowance of appeal is DENIED.

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

SAYLOR, Justice, dissenting.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would allow the appeal to determine whether an order, which is otherwise final under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c), must nevertheless be deemed non-appealable because it arose in the setting of a proceeding under Section 510(c) of the Public Utility Code.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UPS v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N
(Mar 25, 2008)