AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SANDRA ELENA HATEM, Respondent, v. ALBERT ANTHONY HATEM, Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal from the transcript is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a transcript ( see Matter of Dwayne G., 264 AD2d 522); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent. The Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' circumstances had changed in the time between the entry of a prior pendente lite order and the entry of the order appealed from, and properly granted the plaintiff's request, inter alia, for an increase in the defendant's child support obligation.

Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court, and then only under exigent circumstances, which do not exist here ( see Swickle v Swickle, 47 AD3d 704; DeVerna v DeVerna, 4 AD3d 323).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HATEM v. HATEM
(Mar 25, 2008)