AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES STAMPS, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The County Court, which considered, inter alia, the significant amount of drugs the defendant possessed, his extensive and violent criminal history, and poor prison disciplinary record, providently exercised its discretion in determining that "substantial justice dictate[d] that the application should be denied" (L 2004, ch 738, § 23; see People v Alvarado, 48 AD3d 329; People v Aguirre, 47 AD3d 489; People v Ayala, 43 AD3d 800; People v Vega, 40 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021; People v Sanders, 36 AD3d 944, 946-947; People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. STAMPS
(Apr 8, 2008)