NAVARETTE v. ALEXIADES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 2006-07588.

Attorney(S)

Cardali Cardali, P.C. (Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York, N.Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III] of counsel), for appellant. Aaronson, Rappaport, Feinstein Deutsch, LLP (Steven C. Mandell of counsel), for respondent Michael Alexiades. Peltz Walker, New York, N.Y. (Bhalinder L. Rikhye of counsel), for respondent Hospital for Special Surgery.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 2006-07588.

Attorney(S)

Cardali Cardali, P.C. (Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York, N.Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III] of counsel), for appellant. Aaronson, Rappaport, Feinstein Deutsch, LLP (Steven C. Mandell of counsel), for respondent Michael Alexiades. Peltz Walker, New York, N.Y. (Bhalinder L. Rikhye of counsel), for respondent Hospital for Special Surgery.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JORGE NAVARETTE, Appellant, v. MICHAEL ALEXIADES et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

The plaintiffs motion, which was denominated as for one for leave to renew and reargue, was not based on new facts ( see CPLR 2221 [e]; Trahan v Galea, 48 AD3d 791). Therefore, the motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable ( see Trahan v Galea, 48 AD3d 791; Eight In One Pet Prods, v Janco Press, Inc., 37 AD3d 402).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.