AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN MATONE et al., Respondents, v. SYCAMORE REALTY CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On its renewed motion, the plaintiffs demonstrated their entitlement to the entry of a default judgment against the appellant. The plaintiffs submitted proof of service of the summons and complaint, proof of the facts constituting their claim, and proof of the appellant's default in answering or appearing ( see CPLR 3215 [f]; Allstate Ins. Co. v Austin, 48 AD3d 720; Grinage v City of New York, 45 AD3d 729).

To avoid the entry of a default judgment, the appellant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense to the action ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Petersen v Lysaght, Lysaght Kramer, P.C., 47 AD3d 783; Giovanelli v Rivera, 23 AD3d 616). The appellant failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' renewed motion.

[ See 14 Misc 3d 1217(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50061(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATONE v. SYCAMORE
(Apr 22, 2008)