AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MELVIN JAMES JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. DON JACKSON, Warden; Dr. CHARLES HARDEN, and Nurse EDGY, PA, Defendants.

ORDER

WILLIAM MOORE JR., District Judge

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommended Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

In his Objections, Plaintiff contends he asserted in his Complaint that he was experiencing excruciating pain and that he had blood in his urine. Plaintiff asserts these allegations clearly fall within the imminent danger of serious physical injury exception applicable to the three strikes rule.

Based on the reasoning found in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACKSON v. JACKSON
(May 1, 2008)