AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRENDA CORNELL, Respondent, v. 360 WEST 51ST ST. REALTY, LLC, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. 360 WEST 51ST ST. REALTY, LLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents,

Plaintiff alleges she was injured by hazardous substances released into the air during demolition work performed by 360 West 51st Street Realty and the Brusco Realty defendants (including the latter's property manager, Baranoff). Those defendants commenced a third-party action against Supreme Services, alleging negligent removal of debris from the basement of the apartment building.

Although "a contractual obligation, standing alone, will generally not give rise to tort liability in favor of a third party" ( Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136, 138), an exception exists where a contractor who undertakes to perform services pursuant to a contract negligently creates or exacerbates a dangerous condition by launching its own "force or instrument of harm" ( Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co., 247 NY 160, 168 [1928]; see also Espinal, 98 NY2d at 141-142; Grant v Caprice Mgt. Corp., 43 AD3d 708; Prenderville v International Seru. Sys., Inc., 10 AD3d 334). Plaintiffs allegation that Supreme negligently removed the debris falls within this exception ( see id. at 336-338). The record in this case presents triable issues of fact regarding the manner in which Supreme performed the work for which it had been hired.

We have examined Supreme's challenge to its addition as a direct party defendant and find it without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CORNELL v. 360 WEST 51ST ST
(May 6, 2008)