Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Mary Rose MERLINI, by and Through her Attorney-In-Fact Joseph P. Merlini v. GALLITZIN WATER AUTHORITY, Hegemann and Wray Consulting Engineers, Kukurin Contracting, Inc. Petition of Hegemann and Wray Consulting Engineers.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2008 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court's published decision below is inconsistent with its decision in Varner v. Classic Communities Corporation, [ 890 A.2d 1068 (Pa.Super. 2006)] relative to professional negligence claims?
a) Whether a cause of action is one of professional negligence if it depends upon expert testimony forelucidation?
b) Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that, although expert testimony is required as to [Petitioner]'s negligence, [Respondent]'s cause of action was not one of professional negligence?

(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to apply the plain language of the Engineer, Land Surveyor and Geologist registration law in holding that the subject of complaint did not assert a professional negligence claim?

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MERLINI v. GALLITZIN WATER AUTHORITY
(May 20, 2008)