Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the defendants' motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint and dismiss the action is denied.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in striking the complaint, as there was no clear showing that the plaintiffs' failure to comply with certain discovery demands and court-ordered discovery was willful or contumacious ( see CPLR 3126; Manko v Lenox Hill Hosp., 44 AD3d 1014; Mawson v Historic Props., LLC, 30 AD3d 480, 481; Lombardo v St. Francis Hosp. Rehabilitation Servs., 16 AD3d 385, 386). The record supports a finding that the plaintiffs substantially, albeit tardily, complied with the requested disclosure, and that their conduct was not willful or contumacious ( see Manko v Lenox Hill Hosp., 44 AD3d 1014; Mawson v Historic Props., LLC, 30 AD3d at 481; Lombardo v St. Francis Hosp. Rehabilitation Servs., 16 AD3d at 386).