Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. JUVENAL RAMIREZ-BIRRUETA, a/k/a "Ju

ORDER

EDWARD NOTTINGHAM JR., District Judge

This matter is before the court on the Government's motion (#631) for clarification regarding a hearing scheduled for June 6, 2008. Because of numerous other matters scheduled for that date, the court will not be able to devote the time which the Government thinks the hearing will take. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion for clarification is GRANTED.

2. At the hearing scheduled for June 6, the court will hear and attempt to rule on any motion not requiring the taking of evidence. It will also schedule an evidentiary hearing as soon as possible.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. RAMIREZ-BIRRUETA
(Jun 2, 2008)