Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

TODD S. HUMPHREY, Plaintiff v. ROBERT HOFMANN, et al. Defendant.

ORDER

J. MURTHA, District Judge

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 7, 2008. (Paper 2). After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

This case is DISMISSED and plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Paper 1) is DENIED as moot. The dismissal shall be considered a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUMPHREY v. HOFMANN
(Jun 2, 2008)