Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number 9:08-CV-271. Attorney(S) DUDLEY HARRIS, Plaintiff, Pro Se, 99-B-1293, Cayuga Correctional Facility, Moravia, New York. HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, Department of Law, Albany, NY. Judges David N. Hurd Acts The Public Health And Welfare — Civil Rights — Generally — Civil Action For Deprivation Of Rights Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Fees And Costs — Procedure — Screening Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — United States Magistrate Judges — Court Officers And Employees — Jurisdiction, Powers, And Temporary Assignment See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. DUDLEY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. FISCHER, Commissioner; SUPT. CORCORAN; MAHER, Deputy Supt. of Sec.; MR. ROCKER, Captain; LT. MAUHIR; LT. SIGNOR; EMERSON, Sergeant; K. STEVENSON, F.O.I.L. Officer; A. COSTILLO, Senior Mail Clerk; MR. BUTLER, CORP, MR. PETERS, DeNOTO, MR. MOORE, LUZIANI, SAVILLE, and MR. BROWN, Each Correctional Officers; R. CHAPIN, Captain, SGT. APPLEBY, T. NAPOLI, Grie DECISION and ORDER DAVID HURD, District Judge Plaintiff, Dudley Harris, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated April 15, 2008, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that prior to dismissal of plaintiff's complaint, plaintiff be provided an opportunity to cure the deficiencies of his pleading by filing an amended complaint that complies with the instructions within the Report-Recommendation; and that in the event plaintiff does not file a proper amended complaint, that the action be dismissed. The plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report-Recommendation; however, he did file an amended complaint on April 29, 2008. Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Treece, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's amended complaint (Docket No. 8) is referred to the Magistrate Judge for review and determination of compliance as directed in the Report-Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED.