Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants D. Kenneth Luft, Julia D. Luft, and Masanda-Luft Properties, LLC (hereinafter the defendants), which was for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them. To prevail on a claim of unjust enrichment, a party must show that (1) the other party was enriched, (2) at that party's expense, and (3) that it is against equity and good conscience to permit the other party to retain what is sought to be recovered ( see Cruz v McAneney, 31 AD3d 54, 59; Citibank, N.A. v Walker, 12 AD3d 480, 481). The defendants made a prima facie showing that they were not unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff or its insured, Bossolina Development, LLC ( see Citibank, N.A. v Walker, 12 AD3d at 481). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal or without merit.