AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

1050 TENANTS CORP., Respondent, v. STEVEN R. LAPIDUS et al., Appellants.

The Special Referee considered the relevant factors in determining reasonable attorney fees ( see Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9), and his findings are supported by the record ( see Barrett v Toroyan, 45 AD3d 301). Time sheets of the nontestifying attorneys were properly admitted as business records; applicability of the hearsay exception was unchallenged. "Fees on fees" were properly awarded ( see Senfeld v I.S.T.A. Holding Co., 235 AD2d 345, lv dismissed 91 NY2d 956, lv denied 92 NY2d 818; cf. Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 288 AD2d 14).

We have considered defendants' other contentions and find them unavailing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

1050 TENANTS v. STEVEN
(Jun 5, 2008)