AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of LEMAR H. FORESTDALE, INC., et al., Respondents; ERVIN H., JR., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of KENMAR H. FORESTDALE, INC., et al., Respondents; ERVIN H., JR, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.).

Ordered that the appeals from so much of the orders of fact-finding and disposition as determined that the father was not entitled to notice of the adoptions and that he was not a putative father whose consent to the adoptions was required are dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders of fact-finding and disposition are affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from so much of the orders as determined that the father was not entitled to notice of the adoptions and that his consent to the adoptions was not necessary must be dismissed as those portions of the orders were entered on the father's consent and no appeal lies from an order entered on the consent of the appealing party ( see Matter of Angelique L., 42 AD3d 569, 571; Matter of Tyshawn Jaraind C., 33 AD3d 488).

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court properly determined that freeing the subject children for adoption by their maternal grandmother was in their best interests ( see Matter of Kasiem H., 230 AD2d 796, 797).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE LEMAR
(Jun 10, 2008)