VAN DUREN v. RZASA-ORMES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. A-52 September Term 2007.

Attorney(S)

Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant ( Gibbons
Schepisi McLaughlin, attorneys
Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, John A Schepisi
Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs). Steven R. Klein, argued the cause for respondent ( Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman Leonard, attorneys
Mr. Klein
Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs). David G. Evans, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. A-52 September Term 2007.

Attorney(S)

Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant ( Gibbons
Schepisi McLaughlin, attorneys
Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, John A Schepisi
Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs). Steven R. Klein, argued the cause for respondent ( Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman Leonard, attorneys
Mr. Klein
Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs). David G. Evans, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).

For affirmance — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Comments