AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GOLDMAN GREENBAUM, P.C., Respondent, v. PARISIS G. FILIPPATOS, Appellant.

The Fee Dispute Resolution Program has no applicability where the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000 ( see 22 NYCRR 137.1 [b] [2]); both parties agree that the amount in dispute substantially exceeds that amount. Plaintiff contends that since it rescinded the tentative credit of $50,000, the amount owed by defendant client is approximately $140,000. Defendant admits he paid only $114,000 of the approximately $250,000 billed in attorney's fees. The amount in dispute clearly exceeds the $50,000 cap.

Plaintiff law firm did not consent to arbitration ( 22 NYCRR 137.2). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether defendant waived his right to arbitration.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDMAN v. FILIPPATOS
(Jun 24, 2008)