Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

STONEY LEE SCHAEFFER, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, SGT. W. SCHAMP; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, OFFICER — CYR Defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. no. 1) on November 14, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan filed a Report and Recommendation on May 28, 2008 (doc. no. 28), recommending that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 23) be granted. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation and advised that he had until June 16, 2008 to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2008;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 23) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 28) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated May 28, 2008, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHAEFFER v. SCHAMP
(Jun 25, 2008)