AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATRIZIA VITTORIO, Respondent, v. U-HAUL COMPANY et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants failed to make a prima facie showing that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition ( see Hudlin v Epicurean Deli, 46 AD3d 752). In addition, the appellants did not submit any evidence to establish their contention that the allegedly defective condition was trivial ( see Reeves v New York City Tr. Auth., 276 AD2d 543). The appellants merely pointed to gaps in the plaintiffs proof, rather than affirmatively demonstrating the merit of their defense, and thus they failed to carry their burden as movants seeking summary judgment ( see Pappalardo v Long Is. R.R. Co., 36 AD3d 878; Kucera v Waldbaums Supermarkets, 304 AD2d 531). We reach this conclusion without considering the decedent's pre-action examination under oath, taken by the defendant Republic Western Insurance Company, which the appellants contend is inadmissible against them ( cf. CPLR 3117 [a] [3]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VITTORIO v. U-HAUL CO
(Jun 24, 2008)