AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of DOMINICK J. SUTTON, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was served with a written recommendation that he be placed in administrative segregation. Following a hearing, it was determined that petitioner posed a danger to the safety and security of the facility and, thus, the recommendation was sustained. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The record, including the written recommendation for administrative segregation, confidential documentation and confidential hearing testimony, establishes that petitioner was responsible for a "contract hit" on a sergeant in the Erie County Sheriffs Department. The record further reveals that, while petitioner was still in the county jail, "hack blades" had been mailed to him but were intercepted by the staff. In our view, the foregoing constitutes substantial evidence that petitioner's "presence in [the] general population would pose a threat to the safety and security of the facility" ( 7 NYCRR 301.4 [b]; see Matter of Dumpson v Fischer, 51 AD3d 1161, 1162). Accordingly, the determination to place petitioner in administrative segregation will not be disturbed.

We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and, to the extent preserved, find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUTTON v. SELSKY
(Jun 26, 2008)