Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Case No. SC06-2211. See more information ... Smart Summary Case Summary: Abraham Yisrael v. State of Florida, Case No. SC06-2211 Court: Supreme Court of Florida Date: July 10, 2008 Lower Tribunal: 4D04-2967 Factual and Procedural Background This opinion is procedural in nature. It addresses the Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing following issuance of a revised opinion by the court. The document does not include factual allegations, the substantive holdings of the revised opinion, or the events that led to the underlying litigation; it reports only the court's disposition of the Motion for Rehearing and the justices who concurred. Legal Issues Presented The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues. Arguments of the Parties The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments. Table of Precedents Cited No precedents were cited in the provided opinion. Court's Reasoning and Analysis The court's analysis as stated in the opinion is concise. The complete rationale provided is the single explanatory phrase: "In light of the revised opinion." The court used the existence of that revised opinion as the basis for denying the Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing. No additional legal reasoning, statutory interpretation, or discussion of case law is included in the text supplied. Holding and Implications Holding: The Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing is denied. Implications: The immediate and direct effect of the court's action is the denial of the Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing. The opinion contains no discussion of broader legal implications or precedent-setting language; it does not identify any new rule of law or modify existing precedent in the text provided. The document records that the denial is issued "in light of the revised opinion," indicating the revised opinion was dispositive for the court's disposition of the rehearing motion, but the content of that revised opinion is not included here. Concurring Justices The opinion notes concurrence by the following members of the Court: QUINCE, C.J. WELLS, J. ANSTEAD, J. PARIENTE, J. LEWIS, J. CANTERO, J. BELL, J. Source: Excerpt of the court opinion provided with caption and disposition text stating: "In light of the revised opinion, the Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied." No additional substantive material or citations were included in the supplied text. Show full summary ... ABRAHAM YISRAEL, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s). In light of the revised opinion, the Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.