Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record establishes that the defendant's written and oral waivers of his right to appeal were intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily made ( see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257). The defendant's valid and comprehensive waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to controvert an extended and amended eavesdropping warrant and to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officers ( see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831; People v Cardona, 51 AD3d 941; People v Johnson, 269 AD2d 468; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89).