AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. GILBERT TIMOTHY ALLEN, DEFENDANT.

OPINION ORDER

KAREN CALDWELL, District Judge

This matter is before the Court upon the Motion to Suppress and Exclude Evidence [R. 12] filed by the Defendant. The matter was then referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration.

On August 17, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation [R. 35]. Based on a review of the record and applicable law, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendant's motion should be denied and gave the Defendant ten (10) days to file objections.

Defendant has filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [R. 35]. This Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's proposed report and recommendation to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Since the Defendant has made no objections to the Report and Recommendation [R. 35], the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, the Court, being otherwise sufficiently advised, HEREBY ORDERS that: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [R. 35] is hereby ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and (2) The Motion to Suppress and Exclude Evidence [R. 12] is hereby DENIED. (3) A Pretrial Conference is scheduled to be heard on October 26, 2007 at 1:00 p.m. in London, Kentucky. A Jury Trial will begin on November 13, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. Should the defendant wish to change his plea, an appropriate motion should be filed seven days prior to the Pretrial Conference.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. ALLEN
(Oct 1, 2007)