Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DONALD SAXON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT ERCOLE, Superintendent, Green Ha

ORDER

SIDNEY STEIN, District Judge

In a Report and Recommendation dated April 7, 2008, Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger recommended that this petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. After a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Dolinger's Report and Recommendation dated April 7, 2008, petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 5, 2008, and respondent's Affidavit in Opposition to Petition for Habeas Corpus dated May 5, 2008,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Dolinger's "Report and Recommendation" is adopted;
2. The petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed;
3. As petitioner has made a substantial showing that reasonable jurists could find it debatable whether he was deprived of his constitutional rights pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), a certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to the alleged Brady violation. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d 542 (2000); and
3. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence in support of his conviction for depraved indifference murder pursuant to New York law, a certificate of appealability shall not issue with regard to that claim. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Middleton v. Attorneys Gen. of New York and Pennsylvania, 396 F.3d 207 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam).
SO ORDERED:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAXON v. ERCOLE
(Aug 12, 2008)