Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

DARREN McMULLEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE KAHN, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on July 29, 2008, by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 10).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Lowe's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 10) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, and that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings; and it is further

Sentence four reads: "[t]he court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2005).

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McMULLEN v. ASTRUE
(Aug 18, 2008)