AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of SANDRA BARASH, as Beneficiary of the Ir v. ng G. Kates New York Trust, et al., Appellants,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly enjoined the petitioners from commencing further litigation against the respondent, Northern Trust Corporation, without the express written permission of the court. Notwithstanding their status as pro se litigants, the petitioners were determined to litigate issues in this proceeding that they had preferred not to raise, but which could have been or were raised, in the Florida Probate Court ( see Matter of Robert v O'Meara, 28 AD3d 567, 568; Braten v Finkelstein, 235 AD2d 513, 514). This determination to relitigate includes the recent action in the Supreme Court, the dismissal of which is the subject of the order appealed from in the companion case ( see Barash v Northern Trust Corp., 54 AD3d 383 [decided herewith]).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARASH v. NORTHERN TRUST
(Aug 19, 2008)