AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Justin RAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOFFMANN-LaROCHE INC., Roche Laboratories, Inc., F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Roche Holding Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. Caleb Robert McClain, Kathleen L. McClain-Rosario, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

PER CURIAM:

Several plaintiffs, whose product-liability claims against Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., were consolidated, appeal the summary judgment in favor of Hoffman-LaRoche that was based on a ruling by the district court that their causation evidence was inadmissible. See In re Accutane Prods. Liab., 511 F.Supp.2d 1288 (M.D.Fla. 2007). We have considered the briefs, the relevant parts of the record, and the well-reasoned opinion by the district court and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the evidence and properly granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAND v. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE INC
(Aug 26, 2008)