Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GUSTAVO A. CARCIA, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS (Documents #8 #9)

ANTHONY ISHII, District Judge

ORDER VACATING SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 HEARING

On July 29, 2008, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Sixth Count of Plaintiff's Complaint entitled "Negligent Hiring, Retention and Supervision." August 22, 2008, the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed that Defendants' motion would be granted and Plaintiff would be given leave to amend to clarify/expressly allege his cause of action as against Defendants County of Tulare and Bill Wittman, Tulare County Sheriff-Coroner. On August 28, 2008, the court granted the parties' request. However, a review of the court's docket reveals that Defendants' motion has been termed as an outstanding motion and this motion remains set on the court's September 8, 2008 calendar.

Accordingly, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the court ORDERS that:

1. The pending motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and

2. The September 8, 2008 hearing date is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARCIA v. COUNTY OF TULARE
(Sep 2, 2008)