ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION BY CAREMARK TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMIT FOR FILING CAREMARK'S RESPONSE TO STATE OF TEXAS' OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL MASTER'S RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CAREMARK'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL REBATE DISCOVERY
ROYAL FURGESON, District Judge
After due consideration of Caremark's Unopposed Motion to Exceed the Page Limit for Filing Caremark's Response to State of Texas' Objections to Special Master's Recommendations with Respect to Caremark's Motion for Reconsideration of Its Motion to Compel Rebate Discovery (Docket No. 631), the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED.
It is therefore ORDERED that Caremark's Response to State of Texas' Objections to Special Master's Recommendations with Respect to Caremark's Motion for Reconsideration of Its Motion to Compel Rebate Discovery may be extended up to and including fourteen (14) pages of text, exclusive of the Certificate of Service.
It is so ORDERED.
ORDER GRANTING TEXAS'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR FILING ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL MASTER'S RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CAREMARK'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL REBATE DISCOVERY Upon consideration of the State of Texas's Unopposed Motion to Exceed the Page Limit for Filing Its Reply in Support of Its Objections to Special Master's Recommendations With Respect to Caremark's Motion for Reconsideration of Its Motion to Compel Rebate Discovery (Docket No. 642), and noting that the Motion is unopposed, good cause for granting the motion has been show.
It is hereby ORDERED that the State of Texas's motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the State of Texas may file its Reply In Support of Its Objections to Special Master's Recommendation With Respect to Caremark's Motion for Reconsideration of Its Motion to Compel Rebate Discovery, that is up to eight (8) pages in length excluding the signature block and certificate of service.