Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoine SMITH, Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antoine Smith, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred by not telling the jury to disregard a comment by the prosecutor during closing argument.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SMITH
(Sep 9, 2008)