Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. William Henry JOHNSON, a/k/a Skip, Defendant — Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

William Henry Johnson appeals the district court's order denying the motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 Supp. 2008), to reduce his sentence. Because Johnson has completed his term of imprisonment, his appeal may well be moot. See United States v. Guess, 541 F.Supp.2d 399, 401-05 (D.Me. 2008). In any event, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson's § 3582(c) motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. JOHNSON
(Sep 10, 2008)