AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ALBERT WILSON, Petitioner, v. KEITH DUBRAY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Petitioner was engaged in a physical altercation with another inmate and, when he ignored a correction officer's directive to stop fighting, the response team had to be called to break up the fight. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, engaging in violent conduct and refusing a direct order. He pleaded guilty to refusing a direct order and was found guilty of all charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Initially, inasmuch as petitioner pleaded guilty to refusing a direct order, he is precluded from challenging the evidence supporting the determination in this regard ( see Matter of Britt v Goord, 40 AD3d 1321, 1322; Matter of Price v Goord, 29 AD3d 1203, 1204). Moreover, the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence supporting the determination finding petitioner guilty of the remaining charges ( See Matter of Green v Goord, 26 AD3d 562, 563). Even if petitioner did not initiate the altercation, this does not absolve him of guilt under the circumstances presented ( see Matter of Gloster v Goord, 278 AD2d 568, 568, appeal dismissed 96 NY2d 825). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination at hand.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILSON v. DUBRAY
(Sep 11, 2008)