Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of LEOPOLD SIAO-PAO, Appellant, v. ROBERT DENNISON, as Acting Chairman of the New York State Di

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The courts below applied the correct legal standards and properly considered the Board of Parole's written determination, which, when evaluated in the context of the parole hearing transcript, demonstrated that the Board considered the required statutory factors ( see Executive Law § 259-i; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476). The Board's written determination, while less detailed than it might be, is not merely "conelusory" and so does not violate Executive Law § 259-i (2) (a) (i).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIAO-PAO v. DENNISON
(Sep 16, 2008)