Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSE ORRACA, Plaintiff, v. C.O.R. PILATICH; C.O. RIOS; C.O. LaFORGE; C.O.R. KLEISTER; and C.O. VELEZ, Defendants.

ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, Jose Orraca, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a Report Recommendation dated August 28, 2008, the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for partial summary judgment be granted and that plaintiff's claims against defendants Rios, LaForge, and Valez be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to the Report Recommendation have been filed by the plaintiff.

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which the plaintiff has objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants C.O. Rios, C.O. LaForge, and C.O. Valez are DISMISSED with prejudice; and

3. Remaining for trial are plaintiff's claims against C.O. R. Pilatich and C.O. R. Kleister.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ORRACA v. C.O.R. PILATICH
(Sep 24, 2008)