Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dyandria MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NYPD, ACS, Forestdale Foster Care Agency, John and Jane Doe, Lucille Blunt, Pascal Jean-Noel, Angelo Paccione, Defendants-Appellees.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Dyandria Murray appeals from a judgment entered March 14, 2007, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Holwell, J.), granting Defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings. We assume the parties' familiarity as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

On appeal, Murray argues, inter alia, that her federal and state law claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, and custodial interference, as well as her state law claim for malicious prosecution are not time-barred under the relevant statutes of limitation, and that the district court further erred in dismissing her federal law malicious prosecution claim. We find these arguments to be without merit. We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Murray's complaint substantially for reasons stated in the district court's opinion and order. See Murray v. Admin. for Children's Servs., 476 F.Supp.2d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURRAY v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Sep 25, 2008)