Since defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds he raises on appeal, and since this case does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662), his challenge to the validity of the plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The record establishes that defendant's plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary and there was nothing in the plea allocution that cast significant doubt on his guilt ( see People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725). The requisite intent to cause serious physical injury could be readily inferred from defendant's responses during the allocution ( see People v McGowen, 42 NY2d 905; see also People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780, 781). The court's inquiry into defendant's claim of selfdefense was sufficient to establish that he had no viable justification defense, and that he made a valid waiver of that defense.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.