Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ARKIL JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. HABLE, ET AL., Defendant.

ORDER

RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on March 8, 2007. On January 10, 2008, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On August 1, 2008, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 24, 2008.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions of the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for assignment of counsel.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. HABLE
(Sep 30, 2008)