AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of PRINCE T. ALARAPE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT et al., Respondents.

Termination of petitioner's subsidy for violation of the regulations governing the voucher assistance program for low-income housing, under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 as amended ( 42 USC § 1437f), was supported by substantial evidence. The penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Gerena v Donovan, 51 AD3d 502).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRINCE v. N.Y. CITY DEPT
(Oct 2, 2008)