AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of MERRICK T. and Another, Infants. ONTARIO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; SUSAN M.-T., Appellant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order of disposition that, upon a finding that she neglected her two children, placed the mother and her children under the supervision of the Seneca County Department of Social Services for a period of one year. Contrary to the mother's contention, the finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Matter of Stephanie B., 245 AD2d 1062). Following the fact-finding hearing, Family Court concluded that the mother "unreasonably . . . inflicted harm" upon one of her children (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]), and that the other child was derivatively neglected ( see Matter of Michelle M., 52 AD3d 1284). In reviewing the court's determinations, we must accord great weight and deference to them, "including [the court's] drawing of inferences and assessment of credibility," and we will not disturb those determinations where, as here, they are supported by the record ( Matter of Shaylee R., 13 AD3d 1106, 1106).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE MERRICK
(Oct 3, 2008)