Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NICHOLAS JOHN ROSS, Petitioner, v. DWIGHT L. FONDREN, Defendant.

ORDER

MICHAEL DAVIS, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 31, 2008. [Docket No. 15]. Petitioner Nicholas John Ross filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 16]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, with the exception that, on the second line of the third paragraph of page six, "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c)" is changed to read "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)."

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 31, 2008 [Docket No. 15], with the exception that, on the second line of the third paragraph of page six, "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c)" is changed to read "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)."
2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSS v. FONDREN
(Oct 28, 2008)