Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsyl v. nia, Respondent

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Did the Superior Court contradict Commonwealth v. Grant in purporting to create its own new exception to that case?
b. Did the Superior Court contradict Commonwealth v. Reaves by holding that any PCRA petitioner entitled to a nunc pro tune direct appeal is automatically entitled to nunc pro tune post sentence motions as well, without proving prejudice?
c. Did the Superior Court usurp this Court's exclusive authority to create procedural rules under Article V, § 10(c) of the state constitution?

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COM. v. LISTON
(Oct 31, 2008)