AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DONALD DACE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH BARTHOLOMEW, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RODNEY SIPPEL, District Judge

This matter is before me on plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second supplemental exhibit list and plaintiffs' objection to defendant's exhibit list. Plaintiffs first claim that their objections are timely filed because they are filed at least ten days before trial in compliance with the case management order. Plaintiffs are wrong. The case management order measured all pretrial deadlines from the first trial date, which has now been moved to November 10, 2008. The order moving the trial date did not grant the parties leave to file additional pretrial materials. The deadline to file pretrial materials, and objections thereto, has expired. Therefore, I will summarily overrule plaintiffs' objections to defendants' exhibit list.

For this reason, I am also denying the motion to file a supplemental exhibit list. Plaintiffs offer no explanation for why these exhibits are being offered out of time, and their motion implies that at least one of these exhibits may not have even been previously disclosed to defendant.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' objections to defendant's exhibit list [#193] are overruled, and plaintiffs' motion for leave to file supplemental exhibit list [#194] is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DACE v. BARTHOLOMEW
(Nov 3, 2008)