Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH HINDS, Defendant.

ORDER

F. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed motion to continue status hearing [23]. For good cause shown, the court will grant a continuance and continue the status conference.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue and set for a status conference is granted as follows:

1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Status Hearing [23] is granted;
2. The status hearing of this matter is continued to October 22, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett, Courtroom No. 6, Second Floor, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 So. 18 th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting a continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between November 3, 2008, and October 22, 2009, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act because defendant has entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the government which may ultimately result in this case being dismissed. Further, the failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B)(iv).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. HINDS
(Nov 3, 2008)