AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE GARCIA, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence presented at the hearing to support the designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Niola, 50 AD3d 991; People v Galligan, 41 AD3d 683; People v Wright, 37 AD3d 797). There is no merit to the defendant's assertion that he was improperly assessed certain points on the risk assessment instrument, or that he was entitled to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level three designation ( see People v Arciola, 54 AD3d 741; People v Pardo, 50 AD3d 992; People v Foy, 49 AD3d 835; People v Lombard, 30 AD3d 573)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GARCIA
(Nov 12, 2008)