Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with engaging in violent conduct, attempting to assault a staff member, refusing a direct order and committing an unhygienic act. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the related documentation, photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing, comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Boley v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1411, 1412). To the extent that petitioner offered a retaliation defense, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Kearney v Fischer, 51 AD3d 1185, 1186). Petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance is unsubstantiated by the record and, in any event, there is no indication that he suffered any prejudice as a result of the purported deficiencies ( see Matter of Gonzalez v Fischer, 53 AD3d 945, 946). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to present witness testimony and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been scrutinized and found to be without merit.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.