It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the court in which he was convicted lacked jurisdiction. Contrary to petitioner's contention, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition sua sponte. The issues raised in the petition either could have been or were raised on direct appeal or by a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 ( see People ex rel. Smith v Burge, 11 AD3d 907, lv denied 4 NY3d 701; People ex rel. Gloss v Costello, 309 AD2d 1160, lv denied 1 NY3d 504; People ex rel. Minter v Eisenschmidt, 294 AD2d 939, lv denied 98 NY2d 609).