AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Jacqueline Stanton STEWART, a/k/a Jackie, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline Stanton Stewart appeals the district court's order denying relief on her motion for modification sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stewart, No. 4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27 (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2008; entered July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEWART v. U.S., 301 Fed.Appx. 199 (4th Cir. 2008)
(Dec 1, 2008)